Видео

Great to hear! Please consider donating or contributing to the project: github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq/#donate Qd mentioned on Readme. auto-cpufreq, if it detects the GNOME Power Profiles service is running, it will automatically disable it. Otherwise, that daemon will cause conflicts and various other performance issues. Especially since as of v1.8 auto-cpufreq makes it redundant: x.com/fooctrl/status/1467469508373884933 If you installed using snap or AUR you should following instruction how to disable it manually: github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq?tab=readme-ov-file#1-power_helperpy-script-snap-package-install-only

You're most welcome! If you want to show your support for the project, please consider donating: github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq#donate

Great to hear! Please consider donating or contributing to the project: github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq/#donate

Always glad to hear comments like this one! Most welcome, spread the word and consider donating or contributing to the project: github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq/#donate

You're most welcome! In meantime, please consider donating or contributing to the project: github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq#donate

For now, there's a manual way to do it: github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq/issues/654 and same question was asked in Discussion as part of: github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq/issues/69

@@AdnanHodzic ty for this great tool. would be nice if one could core park P-Cores and just run on the E-Cores for extra power safing.

Most welcome and I suggest you add this as a comment to the issue/discussion I shared above (so whoever ends up working on this takes in in consideration) and subscribe to it, so when the feature is eventually implemented you'll be first one to know.

Most welcome & please consider donating or contributing to the project: github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq/#donate

Correct, as it does all of this automatically for you. But if you do want to configure it you can also do it github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq#configuring-auto-cpufreq

@@AdnanHodzic thanks sir for responding so quickly. I subscribed to your channel now. I had TLP installed and no difference. I have 15 year old Samsung R540 laptop just changed battery and install Linux debian 12. The battery just gives me so little hours. I also notice when i switch laptop off in morning battery is 30% less. I'm installing now via snap your tool. Thanks so much for your contribution

​@@John14vs6_ Most welcome & please consider donating or contributing to the project: github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq/#donate

Should I install powertop if I already have auto-cpufreq?

@@John14vs6_ no need, but up to you.

Most welcome! In meantime, please consider donating or contributing to the project: github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq/#donate

If thus doesn't do anything for you github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq/?tab=readme-ov-file#battery-charging-thresholds Then please create an issue/feature request: github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq/issues Otherwise if you know what needs to be done please give it a try and contribute to the project: github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq/#code-contribution and you will be credited for your work as part of future release: github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq/releases

@@AdnanHodzicit works. But now it stops charging my laptop under 59%))) i removed cpufreq and reinstall fedora 39, but it still charging only to 59%......

@@ivt8923 github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq/issues

Thank you! Please consider donating or contributing to the project: github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq/#donate

Thanks! It's a Linux app/tool and needless to say, as such it has nothing to do with Windows.

Have you tried overriding the governor to see if it ever switches to "performance" or even using config file? github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq/#2---force-governor-override If problem persists please open an issue on Github: github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq/issues

@@AdnanHodzic Hi Adnan, thanks for your recommendation. It seems like this did the trick and automatic switching worked, it also sticked after reboot. This also works with the CachyOS bore kernel (great combination) 2 hours in now and my battery life has improved, normally id be sitting at 50%, I am at 70%. Really excellent script thank you for the gains in efficiency :) no noticeable impact on performance at all. I've tried your script after fedora automatically updated my Dell bios and locked me out of undervolting which made me find your script! This has made a much bigger impact on battery life and performance so I thank you kindly. Much appreciated!

@@2g1c69 Great to hear! Please consider donating or contributing to the project: github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq#donate​

Glad to hear auto-cpufreq has such positive impact on you! Thank you for sharing this comment, as it can only serve as additional motivation in its further development.

Thanks again! 🤘😎🤘@@AdnanHodzic

Just add, I would also encourage you to consider doing a code contributions to the project. As getting involved with open source is one of the best ways to learn software engineering: github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq/#code-contribution@@dezlymacauley

By observing battery life. If you're using GNOME as your desktop environment, go to Settings > Power which has nice indicator how many hours you have left when you're on battery. Another useful one is GNOME Power Statistics.

nema na cemu :)

Thank you and please consider donating or contributing to the project: github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq/#donate

auto-cpufreq renders power profiles redundant. Because it does it everything automatically for you: twitter.com/fooctrl/status/1467469508373884933?t=YgpGcYJF9EYtwAaYAf_Sjw&s=19

@@AdnanHodzic so what u mean its depending on what my GPU is doing, it will increase the performance or vice versa, for the CPU and the gpu ? like on 2 Firefox tabs will be on power saver, and when i open a game it will change automatically to performance mode ?

@@thericermoon yes, something like that but based on many more factors. Of course, if you wish you can always override it yourself. Would suggest you read project ReadMe for more info github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq or watch first/initial video where went in more detail: ruclips.net/video/QkYRpVEEIlg/видео.html

Most welcome & please consider donating or contributing to the project: github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq/#donate

github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq/?tab=readme-ov-file#3-auto-cpufreq-config-file and use "turbo = never"

@@AdnanHodzic Thanks a lot!)

@@MrMaianeZ Most welcome and please consider donating or contributing to the project: github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq/#donate

github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq#configuring-auto-cpufreq

@@AdnanHodzic Thanks for answer. I know this is not the place to talk about this. Maybe you can help me. The app is realy good. But the answer to my question is not in the link. I already using your auto-cpufreq and i know how it is work. I using app with config file. I setted 2.7ghz max frequancy for charger and selected conservative govarnor. I setted 2 ghz max frequancy for battery and selected conservative governor. So far everythink is normal. When i start a render with charge cpu is working 2.7 ghz all rendering time and it reaches 98°. Why cpu did not throttle? I want when cpu reached 85° automatic decrace max frequancy. This app's just changing my frequancy and governor when i use my device with battery. I think my question's aswer is not here?🤔

@@furkanascoglu9896If you have an issue please report in on: github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq/issues

If you have an issue please report it here: github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq/issues

Btw, I think issue which you're experiencing (with a workaround) can be found here: github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq/issues/499

Great to hear! Please consider donating or contributing to the project: github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq/#donate

@@AdnanHodzic done

@@Chris-tu3xx thanks!

Please refer to: github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq?tab=readme-ov-file#troubleshooting if the problem persists, feel free to open the issue: github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq/issues

Bad, this is mentioned in Readme: github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq#why-do-i-need-auto-cpufreq and if TLP is detected by auto-cpufreq even a message will be printed out to disable/remove it.

Absolutely, Troubleshooting part of ReadMe suggests switching between these 2 if you issues, but usually it should work just fine: github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq/#troubleshooting

@@AdnanHodzic Thanks

I also explained this in v2.0 update video: ruclips.net/video/SPGpkZ0AZVU/видео.htmlI If you install auto-cpufreq as daemon, then it'll always run in background, as also explained on readme: github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq/#install---auto-cpufreq-daemon

Hey, just so I understand. You're asking to create a video that explains how auto-cpufreq works/could work in different scenarios, i.e: high performance laptop, silent desktop, long battery life. Excluding what was described as part from 5:14 to 11:55?

@@AdnanHodzic Yes, this video is for the programmer. Most of the people are happy to watch a Kiosk vending machine instruction. It only tells where to put the money and which button to press. Gnome new desktop has a neat switch for CPU performance settings, just two clicks, then it’s done. All the children need a simple model to understand.

​@@blackjack8957 right, I thought most of this stuff is covered as part of README: github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq/#1-power_helperpy-script-snap-package-install-only or in particular: twitter.com/fooctrl/status/1467469508373884933 IMO Gnome performance settings are very basic, and I literally explain what's wrong with *it* and all other tools out there in beginning of this video: ruclips.net/video/SPGpkZ0AZVU/видео.htmlsi=TIljTupy5dGDng7b&t=30. That is they require you to manually "flip" the switch to change between performance governors and with auto-cpufreq you don't have to do any of this, it does all of it automatically for you based of various criteria, like CPU load, is the computer charging or not, core temperature and etc .. Regardless, since I see a lot of questions like this one in comments, if you or the community get a list of questions that I could answer or clarify some things briefly, I wouldn't mind creating a new video/it could even be shorts video. Let me know!

@@AdnanHodzic The short video idea 'reclaim van de automaat', set and run 2 laptops, one with auto-cpufreq and another without it. Fast forward and one without it runs out of battery. Then you show up wearing jump suits and type ‘sudo auto-cpufreq --install’. There would be something short and catchy words, ‘Get it, see it yourself.’ or ‘This is easy as one, two, three.’ Hope a lot of users try this app and implemented into Debian official packages.

@@blackjack8957 happy to report that there's already a Debian RFP: bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1053294 :)

Go for it. Would be great if you started using Linux again because of auto-cpufreq 🙂 I use Ubuntu 23.10

Thanks for the Super thanks!

Sure! I created it long time ago and use it for my terminal (tilix) background (as well as for my site foolcontrol.org/) foolcontrol.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/background-nu.png enjoy!

If you have issues please report them on: github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq/issues